Few recruitment leaders have a concrete understanding on the negative impacts that result from the tediously dragged recruitment process. While many are satisfied with using a standard speed-of-hire metrics, they do not realize that this actually damages the pace of the process. For one, measuring and reporting the average time is ambiguous, it creates the pretense that the hiring time for pressing needs and mission-critical jobs may actually be a downcast. Another effect is that, not only do companies lose millions of potential profit from leaving a position vacant for far too long, but they will also lose many top prospects from having an image of being slow decision-makers.
You may immediately assume speeding up the process is the natural course of action, but it shouldn't be. There are several inimitable cases where fast hiring actually increases hiring mistakes. These are only a few of the many disadvantages in an awfully paced hiring practice.
Let us allegorize the recruitment process as a dance it requires being one with the tempo and timing of the step. So, in this light, how does one choreograph the recruitment process with such suave and grace?